Early surgery was better than conservative care for short-term disability and pain in sciatica.

نویسنده

  • Michael Yelland
چکیده

ED FROM Peul WC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, et al. Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336:135528. Correspondence to: Dr W C Peul, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; [email protected] Sources of funding: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and Hoelen Foundation, The Hague. c Clinical impact ratings: GP/FP/Primary care 6/7; Surgery/Orthopaedics 6/7; Surgery/Neurosurgery 5/7 C O M M EN TA R Y T he trial by Peul et al helps resolve some of the uncertainty about the role of discectomy in the treatment of sciatica. It has many messages for clinicians dealing with patients with sciatica due to disc herniation. Although long-term outcomes were similar for both groups, by 12 weeks those treated with early surgery had recovered faster than those treated conservatively (data not reported). This applied not only to leg pain and disability, but also to back pain. Over the ensuing 3–6 months, the early surgery group lost their initial advantage, but delayed surgery was performed in 44% of the conservative care group by the end of the trial. Unfortunately, 20% of patients reported unsatisfactory outcomes at 2 years, and 6% of those who had surgery required repeat surgery within 2 years. Conservative care was given by family practitioners, who provided analgesia, encouraged mobilisation, and referred patients to physiotherapy or back to hospital as needed. There was no mention of epidural injections, an option that may offer relief for about half of patients during the early stages of sciatica. This treatment may be less expensive and more acceptable to those who do not want surgery or cannot have surgery for other reasons. The authors rightly advocate more patient involvement in decision making about surgery because the results suggest that both treatment options are legitimate. Patients with a preference for conservative care can be assured that their long-term outcomes will not be inferior but that surgery may be indicated if their condition worsens. The same applies for those who do not have ready access to early surgery. Michael Yelland, MD Griffith University Logan City, Queensland, Australia 1. Gibson JN, Waddell G. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):CD001350. 2. Buttermann GR. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A: 670–9. Repeated measurement analysis curves of mean scores for visualanalogue scale for leg pain. Reproduced with permission from Peul WC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, et al. BMJ 2008;336:1355–8. Therapeutics EBM December 2008 Vol 13 No 6 185 on 4 December 2008 ebm.bmj.com Downloaded from

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of early lumbar disc surgery compared with prolonged conservative care for patients with sciatica over two years of follow-up. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Nine Dutch hospitals. PARTICIPANTS 283 patients with 6-12 weeks of sciatica. INTERVENTIONS Early surgery or an intended six months of continued conservative treatment, with delayed su...

متن کامل

Lumbar Herniated Disc/Sciatica – Microendoscopic Discectomy Versus Open Surgery Versus Prolonged Conservative Treatment

Wayne R. Nelson, DC ConditionForLife.net November 9, 2015 Lumbar-spine disorders rank fifth among disease categories in the cost of hospital care and account for higher costs resulting from absenteeism from work and disability than any other category. The natural history of sciatica is favorable, with resolution of leg pain within 8 weeks from onset in the majority of patients. Although relief ...

متن کامل

Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica: 5-year results of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE This study describes the 5 years' results of the Sciatica trial focused on pain, disability, (un)satisfactory recovery and predictors for unsatisfactory recovery. DESIGN A randomised controlled trial. SETTING Nine Dutch hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Five years' follow-up data from 231 of 283 patients (82%) were collected. INTERVENTION Early surgery or an intended 6 months of conserv...

متن کامل

Predicting the outcome of sciatica at short-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND The prognostic value of the clinical findings elicited in the patient presenting with sciatica is unknown. AIM To investigate whether history and physical examination findings can predict outcome. DESIGN OF STUDY Prospective study of prognostic factors. SETTING A sample of primary care patients with sciatica. METHOD Short-term favourable outcome was registered as improvement ...

متن کامل

Epidural neuroplasty versus physiotherapy to relieve pain in patients with sciatica: a prospective randomized blinded clinical trial.

BACKGROUND Epidural neuroplasty seems to be one of the promising minimally invasive techniques for adhesiolysis in patients with chronic sciatica with or without low back pain. However, because no data exist from randomized studies the aim was to investigate whether this procedure is superior to conservative treatment with physiotherapy. METHODS A total of 99 patients with chronic low back pa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Evidence-based medicine

دوره 13 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008